ME.17:11 - SoTA-Echoing
| Source | Adopted or adapted contribution | Boundary and practitioner implication |
|---|---|---|
| Waern et al., Moving with method: using cards in movement-based design | Keep separate card content and layout, reduced set, Game Board, self-study, teaching, tutoring, novice background, local tailoring, five-novice Work, overload, and the bounded project-change basis. These support a qualified combined-conditions account and credible transmission hypotheses. | The source supplies a candidate/observed-practice branch, not FPF Method admission or enactment. Five novices establish neither carrier-only transmission, long-term retention, causality, wider adoption, nor authority over facilitator choices. A proposed discriminating inquiry needs its own useful, feasible receiving question. |
| Ardi, Sandahl, and Gustafsson, security risk assessment in a large organization | Keep the unlike selection hypotheses, performed-assessment versus nominal-field distinction, covarying supports, and reported use and non-use. Their study also records burden and proposed no-impact treatment; a local requirement’s merits remain a separate decision. | One enterprise establishes neither future authorization, universal causality, transfer, Method admission, nor universal enactment. ME.17’s opposed requirement cases are constructed applications, not findings that the study’s adopted rule was unjustified. |
SRC-DOMAIN-CULTURAL-CONTINUATION-CASES-2001-2026 Essence record and OMG Essence editions | Adopt only separately stated contributor generation, institutional selection, publication, and edition-memory claims whose value, participants, predicate, and interval are recoverable. | Publication and institutional selection do not establish Method admission, practitioner enactment, recognition, retention, superiority, or broad fitness. |
Current FPF C.20, C.36, A.6.RCD, A.6.REL, A.3.1, A.3.2, A.13, A.15.1, B.5, B.5.2, A.10, C.27, C.28, A.3.3, A.15.7, C.11, C.11.DUA, A.19, A.22, and C.30 | Reuse Discipline and cultural questions, relation-claim derivation, conditional occurrence identity, Method, MethodDescription, Agent, and Work claims, needed hypotheses, evidence, inquiry and requirement appraisal, non-forced choice, and conditional structure or architecture claims. | ME.17 supplies the two status branches, testable cultural claim, separate interval and consequence observations, and bounded continuation or intervention decision. It does not redefine or automatically activate the contributing patterns. |
Reopen the pattern when a field case supplies decision-changing evidence for another named cultural predicate, when practitioners cannot derive a testable claim or bound authorization and population, when repeated probes reveal an independent measurement problem, or when current C.20, C.36, A.6.RCD, or A.6.REL semantics change the action.