ME.6:7 - Conformance Checklist

• The result names one obtaining or possible-future practice, receiving result, and decision boundary.
• Every Method and candidate account keeps its prior status.
• Every selected structure can change the decision and is named by its actual structure or relation kind.
• Architecture alternatives differ in their underlying proposed relations, not merely in viewpoint or representation format.
• Method composition, Method unfolding, Work parthood, Work overlap, first–then guards, allocation, support, description, and cultural relations remain separate.
• At least two serious alternatives differ in named relations and include the feasible incumbent when applicable.
• Combined capacity, covering assignments, permission, authority, provider/access, evidence, failure routes, and moved burdens are visible where material.
• Causal-use results are consumed only within their verdict boundary.
• A possible-future decision asserts no obtaining ArchitectureRelation.
• The comparison may end with the choice supported by the evidence. Any selected implementation or trial Work has a worthwhile obtainable contribution, feasible conditions, observations, stop and recovery; a later-use result carries the reconsideration condition material to reliance.