ME.9:7 - Conformance Checklist

• The profile names one admitted Method or candidate status and one current MethodDescription or candidate-account edition.
• Every row names one receiving System and exact Method-related action or decision, qualification window, and stop.
• Every row carries the complete applicable C.37 selection basis defined in §4.2.
• A later use that needs retention can recover the complete selection basis once in its owning result; an immediate sufficient answer requires no new record or omission certificate.
• Each representation kind is established by its direct FPF governor rather than by layout, title, carrier, or profile membership.
• Each row preserves the subject and status distinctions defined in §4.2; the carrier does not supply a missing governed result.
• Project, process, and case accounts retain their recovered direct subjects; co-use for one exact action has its own complete C.37 basis, and every claimed view has its own conformance result.
• A mathematical-lens claim states the formal object, correspondence, intended use, and loss boundary under C.29; ordinary node-link material is not called a mathematical graph.
• Failed or missing direct results return the lower episteme and named gap rather than borrowing support from another layer.
• Current adequacy may be established by direct inspection or matching prior observations. A new user-action probe is selected only for a useful attainable question worth its whole burden; a claimed observed success or failure has its actual evidence and no wider capability, enactment, fit, transfer, worth or authority claim.