ME.9:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them

Anti-pattern	Repair
“This diagram is the Method.”	Name the Method or candidate account, current description edition, direct subject result, exact claim, and use boundary.
“Everyone should use the canonical process map.”	Make another row for every receiver/action pair and expose only its required Method claims and stops.
“Every project, process, and case account must be a view of one Work.”	Recover each direct subject first. Preserve one admitted Work where the claims concern it; keep unlike subjects and their needed correspondences explicit.
“The current publication proves this row may be used.”	Record publication as auxiliary fact; require the direct subject, reliance when material, and receiving results.
“The planned trial is already visible as performed process Work.”	Retain a WorkPlan representation until Work exists and satisfies the direct view or Work criterion.
“Combine all views into one Method structure.”	Keep rows separate unless direct composition and `A.22` selection-use results independently obtain.
“The graph proves the workflow order.”	Identify a mathematical graph and correspondence under `C.29`, or keep the drawing as a non-mathematical episteme.