9. Configure and test the enactment-support arrangement before claiming that a Method Base works

The B2 material now exists, but that does not show that a person can find the current edition, distinguish candidate from admitted content, tailor the live branch, or stop before a tool overreaches. ME.10 therefore starts from three named user tasks rather than from a repository or platform design. The bounded support use USE-EC417-B2-Support-1 asks whether TraceReviewer-17, SafetyReviewer-17, and ReleaseDecider-17 can use the B2 material for WP-EC417-B2-Trial-1 under the existing confidentiality, evidence, assignment, permission, authority, reversibility, and D0 conditions.

9.1 Fix the same three task rows before comparing support configurations

Published files and manual lookup are candidate configurations with no performed task evidence for these three rows, so those configurations remain untested rather than failed. Adding an interaction with SYS-EC417-AIProvider-1 and feedback Work or a feedback receiving relation also remains untested: no mandatory row needs either, and this support test contains no provider interaction, used AI suggestion, human review of such a suggestion, feedback Work, feedback SpeechAct, or feedback receiving use. The bounded PLM/CI candidate configuration is the only one with one observation for every current row. The described observations support retrieval, branch selection and the tested tailoring actions; the missing tailoring definition and permission/authority-stop observation prevent a pass for the full tailoring row or complete task set. The configuration is not established as globally smallest or superior to every alternative.

9.2 Admit the two entry epistemes to the Method Base

MBC-EC417-B2-1 is the project Method Base entry collection for this support purpose and window. It keeps its project namespace, current entry-disposition rule, and continuity condition. The two candidate entries are separate C.2.1 epistemes:

• ECA-EC417-C-Release-v2-1 states the explicit candidate status and current account of C-EC-Release-v2;
• ERP-EC417-WP-B2-1 is about WorkPlan WP-EC417-B2-Trial-1, not about performed release Work.

Entry membership is an instituted relation, not a folder listing. SYS-EC417-MB-PermissionGrantor-1, its obtaining grantor assignment RA-EC417-MB-PermissionGrantor-1, and admitted permission-granting SpeechAct SA-EC417-MB-PermissionGrant-1 ground exact permission PERM-MBENTRY-EC417-1 for curator assignment RA-EC417-MB-Curator-1, action specification PAS-EC417-MB-AdmitRemove-1, scope SCOPE-EC417-MB-Entries-1, and the D-21 through D0 window. AG-EC417-MB-Curator-1 and the obtaining curator assignment supply the A.13 performer core; the permission itself creates neither Work nor a result.

MECH-EC417-MB-EntryDisposition-1 declares reusable operation settleEntryDisposition(entry, collection, admissionWork) -> entryDisposition. Its closed local value kind contains exactly MBEDV-EC417-Admit, MBEDV-EC417-Remove, and MBEDV-EC417-Stop; display words, records, plans, and assertions are not those values. A completed application requires the curator to identify the entry episteme, the collection, the entry-disposition rule, and the admission question; check kind and status, provenance, purpose fit, applicability, return condition, and current membership; and then perform one observable branch-closing act. Without that act there is inspection Work but no completed application or result binding.

At D-21 10:00–10:08, admitted Work W-MBA-EC417-ECA-1 applies the operation to the candidate-account episteme. At 10:10–10:18, admitted Work W-MBA-EC417-ERP-1 applies it to the WorkPlan episteme. Each Work has its own performance history, extent, WorkContainedInEC417MethodEngineering occurrence, A.13 core, A.15.1 admission, post-admission assignment attribution, and PERM-MBENTRY-EC417-1 exercise. Applications APPL-MBENTRY-EC417-ECA-1 and APPL-MBENTRY-EC417-ERP-1 end only at their pair-specific positive approval acts; terminal bindings RB-MBENTRY-EC417-ECA-ADMIT-1 and RB-MBENTRY-EC417-ERP-ADMIT-1 carry exact value MBEDV-EC417-Admit.

Those facts institute MBB-EC417-ECA-1 and MBB-EC417-ERP-1 as the two MethodBaseEntryBelongsTo@Project episodes. Each episode is identified by its exact entry, collection, and maximal continuous interval. A repeated positive result during an open episode creates no second membership; removal requires its own permitted negative application and result. No such removal obtains through D0.

9.3 Test actual use and keep the structure gap separate

The collection makes the two epistemes eligible for the support use. Three separately admitted Work occurrences supply the following observations; the tailoring row’s mandatory permission/authority stop remains untested:

Each SupportSystemUsedInWork@EC417 occurrence requires the independently admitted Work, one exact admitted System, an actual input/output interaction, and use of the returned value in that task. Colocation, access, a click trace, or tool output is insufficient. Each Work keeps its own enacted support-use Method, performer core, containing-System relation, assignment, and post-admission attribution.

RES-MESUP-EC417-B2-1 returns task-pass for retrieval and branch selection, retains the observed tailoring fixture, signed-before-closure and stale-edition results, and returns missing-task-set[tailoring-input-action-result] plus the separate missing-task-test[tailoring-permission-authority-stop] for the full tailoring task. The branch-selection stop cannot supply an observation of another user’s tailoring action. This support test includes no SupportSystemUsedInWork@EC417 occurrence with SYS-EC417-AIProvider-1; retrieving ATP-2 is not provider use. No feedback occurrence SA-MESUP-EC417-FB-1 is asserted. A later failed task would need its own repair and rerun Work rather than a rewrite of these histories.

PSO-EC417-B2-Use-1 remains a proposed organization whose four A.22 candidate groups stay separate: identified constituents; the two membership episodes and three direct PLM/CI-use occurrences; current-edition, status, confidentiality, signed-evidence, assignment, permission, authority, reversibility, and D0 constraints; and the named support-use frame. The case has no selecting System, enacted selection Method, dated structure-selection Work, or direct participation or operation-binding basis. ESA-EC417-B2-1 therefore returns missing-selection-basis and designates no selected U.Structure. That structure-selection gap neither erases the observed task results nor fills the separate missing tailoring test.

The membership episodes, their IBA assertion or evidence epistemes, optional construction account MBCA-EC417-B2-1, edition episteme MBE-EC417-B2-1, publication occurrence PUB-MBE-EC417-B2-1, named-use reliance episteme, proposed organization, selection-gap episteme, and task result remain distinct. Membership and publication do not prove usability; the bounded task results do not prove a general holder capability, Method fit, effectiveness, release performance, or selection of the proposed structure.

9.4 Stop separately at the remaining Method Engineering questions

9.4.1 Preparation now, reopening after performed trials

Invoke ME.9 only for Method representation profile MRP-EC417-B2-Review-1, because two unlike actions must be related without becoming one view. Both return to candidate C-EC-Release-v2 and current candidate-account episteme ECA-EC417-C-Release-v2-1.

Preparation now. C.37 claim group C37-EC417-B2-Prepare-1 has receiver SafetyReviewer-17 and exact action ‘check the supplier-prepared signed-versus-provisional pinout comparison and identify the affected safety checks before release’, using the instruction in section 7; direct subject result ERP-EC417-WP-B2-1 is a C.2.1 episteme about proposed allocation and order, evidence entry, confidentiality, recovery, and stops while preserving WorkPlan status. A.2.4 classifies that preparation use, and A.10 path P-APP-EC417-Prepare-1 returns pass in its current-edition window. ME.6 decision AD-EC417-B2-Trial-1 governs the trial alternative: its predicate compares A, B, and B2 against the receiving, capacity, confidentiality, assignment, permission, authority, evidence, and reversibility conditions; its actual outcome selects no more than three prospective B2 trials under those conditions. That trial choice does not supply a directly governed result admitting this representation’s contribution to the preparation action. The preparation claim group is unresolved until the preparation-use owner returns its governing predicate and actual admitting or declining result. The trial decision grants neither performed Work nor any assignment, permission, or authority.

Reopening after performed trials. C.37 claim group C37-EC417-B2-Reopen-1 has receiver MethodEngineer-17 and exact later action ‘decide which findings from performed trial Work reopen the candidate’. In this application the three-release statement remains WorkPlan WP-EC417-B2-Trial-1: no corresponding release Work has yet been admitted, no exact candidate-episteme/viewpoint-edition pair has been tested under E.17.0, and no direct receiving governor has returned a predicate and outcome for that reopen action. A.2.4 classification or an A.10 path cannot replace those missing results, so this claim group is unresolved.

The relation between the uses. The cross-use profile records the shared evidence-entry, confidentiality, recovery, and stop correspondences, the preparation claim group’s missing receiving result, and the reopening claim group’s separate missing Work, conformance, and receiving bases; it keeps WorkPlan, any later Work, both actions, candidate readings, conformance judgments, and receiving results separate. It creates no super-view, Method admission, fit, transfer, worth, publication, or mathematical graph.