Library / Organization Change Engineering Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:05:05 UTC

OCE.15:11 - SoTA-Echoing

SourceRetained contributionBoundary and practitioner implication
Hagl et al., change-management intervention reviewIntervention families and ability, motivation, and opportunity-to-contribute mechanisms support repertoire fields.The synthesis is not a universal sequence; interactions, boundaries, measurement, and consequences remain open.
Ekendahl et al., context-based adaptationDecision conditions must be assessed and reassessed while change unfolds.Use the study’s entity/process perspectives to inspect changing conditions; qualify the local adaptation Method separately.
Kamarova et al., behavior and organizational-change synthesisMastery, meaning, belonging, and participation counter recipe and “resistance” reduction.The synthesis is selective and primarily individual-level.
Wang et al., implementation-framework scoping review and Nilsen, taxonomyDeterminant, process, strategy, evaluation, and measurement purposes must remain distinct.Use the taxonomies to distinguish functions, then select or construct the Method needed for the local result.
Powell et al., ERIC strategiesDiscrete implementation strategies can be candidate contributions.Determine the required sequence, local fit, and effects for the selected contributions.
Damschroder et al., updated CFIR and Reardon et al., CFIR User GuideA determinant framework requires project-specific boundary and construct operationalization.CFIR is not designed to develop an innovation or specify the implementation process and is not a universal OCE Method.
Proctor et al., implementation outcomes and ten-year reviewImplementation outcomes need named referents and remain distinct from service, client, and organization results.Causal relations among strategies, mechanisms, implementation outcomes, and downstream outcomes remain weakly established.
Current Method Engineering Principles FrameworkGeneral Method results, connected conceptual synthesis, and several viewpoints on one Work.OCE.15 consumes the named ME results and adds only organization-change semantics and use.

Reopen when a source or representative use exposes a materially different domain contribution, framework function, mechanism, situation change, outcome boundary, bundle interaction, or candidate-development need, or when Method Engineering makes an OCE move redundant.