fpf.tools
Library / Organization Change Engineering Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 774–785

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:40:05 UTC

OCE.3:11 - SoTA-Echoing

Source lineRetained contributionUse boundary
Current FPF A.22, C.17, C.18, C.11, C.30, and C.32.CONWAYSelected structures; characterization of existing candidates; conditional open-ended exploration; bounded choice; architecture and mirroring distinctions.Use these patterns for their stated questions; generate the organization-specific alternatives and participant/burden comparison here.
Conway (1968) and Colfer & Baldwin (2016)Communication and product structures can constrain one another; mirroring has exceptions.Test the correspondence for the chosen product and organization; allow exceptions and compare alternatives.
Skelton and Pais, Team Topologies (2019; 2025)Stream-aligned, enabling, platform, subsystem, and interaction concepts can generate candidates.The line is software-heavy. Establish authority, capability and effects separately for the local case.
Schulze-Meeßen and Hamborg, participatory work-design representationsParticipant-facing prototypes can improve some recognition and acceptance.Keep the study’s recognition and acceptance results separate from evidence about organization relations and participants’ contributions.
Heusinkveld and Smits, organization-design knowledge perspectivesDesign ideas should be examined through plural development and translation perspectives.Use the perspectives to examine design knowledge, then make the local concept decision under the applicable authority.

Reopen when a recurring concept family cannot be generated by these branches, a representation hides a decision-bearing relation, or actual realization defeats the comparison dimensions.