Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:17:34 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 10:35:10 UTC
OPS.16:7 - Conformance Checklist
The operating System, use, difficulty, receiving decision, decision maker, horizon, and protected conditions are explicit.
The starting branch names either an exact admitted U.Method and relied-on version or U.MethodDescription, or an exact A.3.1.MR candidate account with source support, real rivals, gaps and explicit non-admission. A distinguishing question is required only when it changes the receiving use.
For a selected trial, the bounded hypothesis, current alternative, material change or branch, stop and decision-changing observation preserve every Method or candidate status; a supported current candidate account does not create that trial.
The trial uses applicable resource and service results; OCE.11 is selected for coexistence around an organization change. Conditions needed for the trial hold when its dependent Work starts; a conditional plan preserves any remaining gap.
A selected trial’s WorkPlan names intended tasks, proposed performers, expected admitted constituent Methods, supports, observations, burdens, protections, stops, hand-back and later use without claiming actual Work.
Every actual Work occurrence has actual performers, enacted admitted Methods, extent, containing System, departures, and direct results. No candidate whole or candidate account is enacted.
Operating, service or reliability, human-condition, queue or constraint, financial, side-effect, burden, missing-evidence, and Method or description observations retain their direct subjects and uses.
Coherence, fit or transfer, worth, evidence reliance, measurement validity, temporal window, and causal reach are qualified only where the receiving decision needs them and through their current owners.
Alternatives use the same operating basis, preserve protected conditions, carry uncertainty, and remain within named authority.
The return uses the permitted branch vocabulary, exact use, evidence window and limits, and relevant repertoire, lineage and reopen consequences. A next observation belongs only to a selected further inquiry, not to every completed account revision or stop.
A board, prompt, tool, description, support, or local departure changes Method identity only when reusable Method semantics changed under A.3.1.
The result claims no organization-wide adoption, cultural selection or retention, causal superiority, new capability, or authority outside its boundary.