Link to current text
OPS.5:6 - Bias-Annotation
| Bias or pressure | How it distorts admission | Countermeasure |
| visibility and rank bias | The top visible item appears authorized and ready. | Test identity, evidence, permission, authority, and start conditions separately. |
| sunk-commitment pressure | Earlier planning or public promise is used to force admission. | Recover the actual commitment parties, conditions, authority, and current status. |
| utilization pressure | Every available person, rig, tool, or model is filled immediately. | State the bounded receiving result and explicit-start limit; preserve deliberate non-start. |
| automation bias | A model recommendation or generated artifact is treated as admission or Work. | Require a separate admission result, authorized starter, performance evidence, and later result evidence. |
| urgency leakage | Age or consequence language becomes automatic admission order. | Leave priority and commitment revision to OPS.7; use only the current admission criteria here. |
| silent-rejection pressure | Deferred or rejected demand disappears from the account. | Preserve identity, disposition, reason, retry or return, and residual demand. |
| source-school anchoring | A familiar board, backlog, buffer, or WIP rule supplies the whole Method. | Adopt only the bounded mechanism that changes this decision and keep its limits explicit. |