PSD.16:2 - Problem

A sensible script can conceal an unsound engagement. Its “elicit, model, compare, recommend” order says little about people correcting claims during modelling, technical evidence arriving during discussion, or a sponsor controlling both participation and the receiving decision.

The same display can also carry incompatible readings. A causal sketch supports exploration; a calculation supports a bounded consequence claim; the closing slide appears to authorize action. If their different uses are hidden, completing the slide can look like completing all three results.

Local repairs then export the difficulty. Moving inquiry outside the meeting frees analytical time but adds participation effort and delays correction. Adding a challenger can broaden discussion while reducing facilitation capacity. Freezing a model stabilizes computation while excluding a changed premise. The practitioner needs to expose and decide these consequences, not merely draw a cleaner sequence.