PSD.16:4.6 - Judge the changed interaction and hand on its conditions

Judge the interaction that justified the change using available observations. Can a corrected concern reach the comparison before it is relied on? Can the modeller identify the evidence version? Can the participant challenge the representation through the chosen channel? Can the separate facilitator sustain the discussion while analysis proceeds? If an unresolved answer could change continuation, select a worthwhile further observation as in 4.3.

A rehearsal supports a prospective arrangement only at its tested scope. For a change used in ongoing work, inspect the resulting contribution and any burden moved elsewhere. A smoother meeting or a completed document alone is not evidence that the material conflict was resolved.

The first result can be a short decision note or spoken return with a recoverable basis. It makes the arrangement, scope, authority, retained conflict, missing result and next observation usable; it need not reproduce every model or conversation.

Carry only consequential constraints into follow-up. For example, a corrected service assumption must reach the named comparison owner; an observation about another configuration does not refresh this result. PSD.14 still designs and compares its own follow-up alternatives. Evidence from this local variant may inform PSD.17, but cultural continuation requires its own observations.

Reopen when the receiving question, a material participant or premise, the model use, the arrangement’s support, or the permitted decision changes; when the chosen exchange fails; or when a moved burden defeats another necessary condition.