fpf.tools
Library / Problem Structuring and Decision Support Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 593–608

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 03:38:16 UTC

PSD.2:4.4 - Attribute concerns, duties, interests, and dissent

Record each material concern in ordinary language with its holder or source and the consequence or receiving-use difference it could make.

Establish what the concern is about before joining it to another concern under the same word. Ask what is being done or changed, where that object or work begins and ends, and what would count as the relevant result. Participants saying “the trip is complete” may mean that the remote task is finished, the traveler has returned, or the expense case is closed. Those are different objects with different completion conditions. Recover how they are related and which result each participant needs. In other cases, participants do concern themselves with the same object: duration and cost can describe the same identified journey. Keep that common reference when it fits.

Use this recovery where ambiguity changes the inquiry; ordinary unambiguous concerns need no separate object inventory. Also identify who or what may bear the consequences; that bearer can be the object being discussed or another System. Distinguish:

  • reported experience from externally supported evidence;
  • duty from preference or interest;
  • individual concern from a represented constituency claim;
  • disagreement from an unresolved factual question; and
  • absence of evidence from evidence of absence.

Keep minority and unresolved positions visible. Facilitation may make contributions usable; it does not establish consensus, truth, priority, permission, or authority.