PSD.2:6 - Bias-Annotation
Scope: participation and concern recovery for one bounded decision-support inquiry. Lenses: Gov keeps contribution, representation, duty, and choice authority distinct; Arch tracks which participants and concerns can change dependent results; Onto/Epist separates Systems, reports, possible paths, and supported relations; Prag stops at a sufficient account; Did supplies plain recognition cues and an explicit assurance boundary.
| Recurring bias | Likely drift | Repair |
|---|---|---|
| visibility bias | Available or powerful speakers define the concern set. | Start from possible consequence bearers and record material absences. |
| attendance-as-representation bias | Presence or title is treated as authority to speak for others. | State the representation basis, scope, and limit separately. |
| participation-as-proof bias | A workshop report is treated as proof of Systemhood, consequence, or consensus. | Keep participation, relation, evidence, and agreement claims distinct. |
| stakeholder-exhaustion bias | Work waits for universal participation. | Stop at adequacy for the named use and return exact gaps. |
| harmony bias | Facilitation erases minority or unresolved positions. | Preserve attributed dissent and its consequence for the next result. |
| human-only bias | Non-speaking or non-human consequence bearers disappear. | Use A.1.CSD to recover affected Systems and possible changes. |