fpf.tools
Library / Problem Structuring and Decision Support Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 672–683

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-02 23:06:08 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 01:38:24 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 03:35:15 UTC

PSD.2:7 - Conformance Checklist

  • The account is bound to one receiving inquiry, subject, horizon, and authority boundary.
  • Participants, affected Systems, represented people, duty or interest holders, and choice owner are not collapsed.
  • Actual relations, modal paths, observed changes, and possible consequences remain distinguishable.
  • Material concerns are attributed; recording them does not imply truth, priority, consensus, or authority.
  • Any relied-upon representation and participation condition is supported and scoped.
  • Missing participants, bearers, concerns, or assurance produce a visible gap, narrowed claim, request, blocker, or abstention.
  • The stopping rule is adequacy for a named next use rather than exhaustive recruitment.
  • Recognition is cheap, while legal, ethical, safety, harm, duty, representation, and authority claims retain their direct assurance.
  • The result can feed plural formulation, boundary, facilitation, value, or inquiry Work without deciding any of them.