Library / Research Method Practice Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:30:20 UTC

RMP.1:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them

Anti-patternWhy it failsRepair
“Everything uncertain is research”Operational uncertainty may contain no unresolved knowledge claim.Name the exact episteme change or return the constraint to its owner.
“Research happens only in research institutions”Institution is neither a necessary nor a sufficient relation.Apply the holder-neutral four-condition test.
“A literature search is the study”Retrieval may already answer the question, or it may be only one supplied input.Return the exact source result or form a separate criticism-bearing question.
“Choose the method, then write the question”A favored apparatus or design can manufacture its own problem.Qualify the frame, episteme change, and criticism demand before RMP.2.
“Run the standard test to be safe”Routine qualification can be useful without being research.Return the test result to its domain owner; reopen only on an unresolved mechanism, validity, transfer, or evidence question.
“Systematic means a checklist exists”Administrative regularity does not make a defeasible question-to-return chain.Preserve premises, performed moves, deviations, evidence, limits, and stops.
“No source result, so explore freely”A missing load-bearing frame prevents honest membership and question qualification.Return the exact source/currentness/comparison need and retry condition.
“One scientific method fits every question”Historical, qualitative, observational, computational, experimental, and synthesis questions expose unlike errors.State the criticism demand here and let RMP.2 compare design families.
“The research result decides the action”Evidence relevance does not transfer values, permission, or authority.Return the bounded episteme contribution to the receiving owner.
“Not research”The label discards useful routing and hides reopen conditions.Return the expected result, owner, available material, and exact retry condition.
“Apply Frascati as a legal or prestige gate”Its R&D-statistics purpose and sector rules do not define all holder-neutral research practice.Use the five criteria as explicitly adapted assurance questions with stated limits.