fpf.tools
Library / Research Method Practice Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 538–564

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:35:10 UTC

RMP.1:7 - Conformance Checklist

Apply these questions to the branch actually taken. The episteme-change and membership questions govern a ResearchQuestionBrief; a supplied answer, adjacent-Work return or research-boundary hold does not complete unused brief positions.

  • RMP1-01: A recognizable ambiguous request, first move, practical gain, stop, and non-use boundary are visible before the detailed method.
  • RMP1-02: The named receiver, bounded use, and separate later-decision authority are explicit.
  • RMP1-03: The current frame is question-relative and records exact supplied results, source snapshot, omissions, and currentness limits.
  • RMP1-04: Serious rivals or lineage are present when they can change the question; a source count is not used as coverage.
  • RMP1-05: A sufficient supplied answer completes both the method and the card before unused brief positions; it retains the source and limits needed for the receiving use without a separate no-study form.
  • RMP1-06: The intended episteme change is exact enough to be retained, narrowed, rejected, qualified, or added.
  • RMP1-07: The bounded question names the phenomenon, unit, case, population or corpus, relevant relation or contrast, constraints, and useful answer.
  • RMP1-08: Unresolvedness is established relative to the qualified frame and named use, not to the performer’s memory.
  • RMP1-09: A non-routine design, interpretation, synthesis, or credibility choice and genuine route/answer uncertainty are explicit.
  • RMP1-10: The intended trace can expose sources, premises, performed moves, evidence, deviations, limits, and stops to criticism.
  • RMP1-11: The intended result is a bounded communicable episteme contribution, not only action, compliance, acceptance, recognition, or private belief.
  • RMP1-12: All four membership conditions pass independently before a ResearchQuestionBrief is returned.
  • RMP1-13: The nearest plausible non-member is named and its difference is stated.
  • RMP1-14: Routine qualification, monitoring, troubleshooting, audit/evaluation, source use, and ordinary Method application have exact owner/result returns and reopen conditions.
  • RMP1-15: Missing or stale source/results produce a named hold with blocked question, owner/interface, and retry condition.
  • RMP1-16: From the available question and source texts, the practitioner can follow §4.3 to a supported answer, a useful comparison or a named remaining gap. Source search, interpretation and applicability failures lead to the corresponding repair.
  • RMP1-17: The application preserves the meanings and conditions of its FPF contributions. A comparison claimed as SoTA meets F.1:4.2.1 and E.8:11; ordinary source use follows its narrower question.
  • RMP1-18: The criticism demand names an error or rival to expose without selecting a design family.
  • RMP1-19: The brief distinguishes the evidence needed for an adequate answer from conditions for finishing with refusal or uncertainty; any unmet answer condition and reopen condition remain visible.
  • RMP1-20: Domain truth, instruments, safety, ethics, rights, access, assurance, and authority remain with their direct owners.
  • RMP1-21: RMP.2 receives only a compatible brief and frame; no design, protocol, authorization, or receiving decision is implied.
  • RMP1-22: Corporate and citizen or independent cases receive the same membership test, with holder-specific constraints preserved.