STR.5:4.2 - Generate contrasts in the logic of contribution

Use the smallest productive questions that could reveal a serious alternative. Could the subject sustain the current contribution differently, serve a different need, combine with another supplier, obtain a needed result externally or leave a contribution it can no longer responsibly sustain? These are prompts, not a compulsory menu.

Describe how the contribution reaches its recipient and what makes continued provision possible. In a commercial case, connect value to payment, costs and responsibilities. In a public or personal case, use the actual purpose and resource conditions instead of importing commercial return.

Retain differences in beneficiaries, outcomes, provision arrangements or resource logic when they change choice. Merge proposals that are only names for the same direction. When a discovered user, problem or useful characteristic changes the relevant possibilities, reopen the generation space; do not confine every new idea to the original categories.

If DOCA.4 has already supplied development directions with supporting configurations and DOCA.5 has qualified their joint reachability, use the applicable result. Strategy adds the question of which contribution should guide this subject’s directions and commitments; it does not require another advisory engagement.