Library / Strategy Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 04:35:14 UTC

STR.6:7 - Conformance Checklist

  • Each family states its common contribution and receiving decision; an exploratory intermediate preserves the unsettled receiving question.
  • Search returns an explained Method with its support and limits, distinguishes any new connecting inference, or names the missing-Method question.
  • Options are complete enough to expose material delivery, support, resource and exit differences.
  • Supported, proposed and unknown premises remain distinguishable.
  • The same consequential burden questions are asked of comparable options.
  • Shared dependencies and conditions of exercise are visible.
  • Material development distinguishes the performed variation, examined difference and usable continuation from a proposal or retained description.
  • A cross-problem transfer is judged on the target conditions and changes the next problem or way question only as its result supports.
  • Retained possibilities have a reason, carrying cost and relevant expiry or reopen condition.
  • Archive value, non-domination, selection and actual joint commitments are not conflated.
  • A sufficient set, precise gap or justified stop can finish the work without another experiment.