fpf.tools
Library / Systems Engineering Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 1409–1428

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:50:10 UTC

SYSE.17:12 - Relations

  • A.1.CSD supplies the general discovery move and bounded consequence account. This pattern adds engineering alternatives, configuration, physical and operational situations, decision contributions, and specialist interfaces.
  • SYSE.1 supplies the System and candidate boundary; SYSE.16 supplies use structures, other Systems, conditions, and unsupported assumptions. Equivalent qualified direct sources can be used without implying a temporal order.
  • A.1, A.14, B.1, B.1.2, and C.13 govern Systems, wholes, collections, delimitation, crossings, and constructive facts. Treat a scale word only as a cue until those objects and relations are grounded.
  • C.28 qualifies a causal-use claim. The Agent performing consequence-discovery Work applies this pattern to identify the Systems that may bear consequences and supplies the resulting account to the receiving engineering decision.
  • D.1–D.5 govern value frames, actual conflicts, mediation, and audits when those questions arise. An affected-System claim states the qualified consequence and bearer.
  • A compatible consequence account can inform SYSE.2, SYSE.8, SYSE.4, SYSE.6, SYSE.10, SYSE.14, and specialist practices. Each receiver rechecks focus, configuration, use, horizon, evidence, and authority.
  • Application profiles retain their own consequence-discovery Methods—for example, safety, security, medical, ecological, legal, economic, software, electrical, building, or transport specializations.