A.15.10:5.1 - A bookmark survives but the reading method does not

An AI assistant resumes a wording review at paragraph six. Its summary says “five paragraphs done; next, six”, but the operative instruction was to determine what each optional expression contributes, not just to replace conspicuous jargon.

It opens the method’s operative section and the last substantive result. The fifth paragraph was completed; the sixth was only located. It reads the sixth paragraph as a connected argument and tries removing “approved” from a procedure name. The word identifies which procedure may be used, so deletion would change the instruction. It retains the word and explains that contribution through the review’s existing result.

The return recovered both the position and the method. It did not require reviewing the first five paragraphs again. The assistant’s reconstruction does not imply a human memory mechanism.