fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 30087–30101

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:01:07 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:04:31 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:10:10 UTC

A.15.11:7 - Conformance Checklist

For a consequential use, inspect the arrangement and the resulting work:

  • Is there a recognizable occasion and a reason the candidate could change the receiving work?
  • Can the recipient recover the applicability relation and a condition that would defeat it?
  • Is the cue encountered through the intended means, with the needed access and authority?
  • Does the next operation have its necessary capabilities and supports, or does the result identify what is missing?
  • Were any extra explanations or aids retained in the claim about what worked?
  • Does the comparison include the cue’s burden and its effect on the encompassing task?
  • Can a useful dismissal, revision or removal count as success?
  • When a checklist carries the cue, can the user inspect its condition and continue when it is unmet, unknown or insufficient for the receiving use?

Use the questions that can change the judgement about this arrangement.