Library / Explanation Design Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:15:10 UTC

EXD.1:7 - Conformance Checklist

For recognition, locate a consequential ambiguity, missing prerequisite or changed question. If the supplied question already supports a useful answer, direct use is enough.

For assurance of this question result, check that:

  • the question and the purpose can be distinguished;
  • the selected relation and action-changing conditions are explicit enough to choose a subject account;
  • any preparation claim has an actual task basis or is stated as an assumption;
  • a new contribution changes the appropriate question, premise, help or interpretation;
  • an unresolved input has a specific return, or the current question has a usable next answer.

These checks concern the question and its use. Retention and transfer need their corresponding evidence.