EXD.1:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them

Failure visible in use	Repair
Repeating why 5.5 is wrong after the recipient selects equal branch weight	Restate the changed aggregation question and answer it under its own rule.
Taking “I understand” or a qualification as evidence of the needed inference	Use an already available response or one relevant inference when that distinction can change assistance.
Treating an elicited list as a complete account of the recipient’s need	Ask what the question would help them do and allow an unlisted contribution.
Reopening a clear request with an elaborate interview	Use the sufficient question and return to clarification only when a consequential uncertainty appears.