GOALS.3:4.3 - Compare complete alternatives

Compare the incumbent continuation with feasible changes in scope, sequence, method, provider, support or commitment. For each, trace what result it preserves, what it displaces and where it moves burden or risk. Keep essential conditions binding; compare remaining preferences through the actual decision owner’s judgement. A weighted score is appropriate only when the underlying trade-offs and evidence justify it.

A limited agenda follows from this comparison. Select a small enough active set for the needed contributions to fit, rather than adopting a universal goal count. An unchosen worthwhile aim can remain a future option with a reason to reconsider. If a short inquiry could change the priority, compare its attainable benefit and full cost through C.11.DUA. Use an adequate present answer when further inquiry would not change the choice.