Library / Human Capability Development Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:30:20 UTC

HCD.15:6 - Bias-Annotation

Recency pressure can make every new tool, source, or incident look like a reason to retrain. Ask which exact holder claim and receiving decision the change can affect, then preserve the rest. Conversely, familiarity with a credential or annual schedule can make repeated activity look safer than a claim-sized reassessment.

Community and provider visibility create another bias: participation is easy to count, while independent transfer and critical errors are harder to observe. Keep activity useful as an arrangement contribution without upgrading it to capability evidence.