Library / Human Capability Development Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:01:07 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:04:31 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:05:10 UTC

HCD.1:7 - Conformance Checklist

  • One exact human person is named as holder; any population use preserves member or representative accounts.
  • The later-Work family, configuration, effective horizon, evidence window, and receiving decision are explicit.
  • Each case distinguishes observed facts from plans, stipulations, and assumptions, and explains which later-Work conditions it represents and why its evidence is suitable for the conclusion.
  • Intended results, quality and critical-error predicates, protected conditions, tools, supports, and specialist interfaces are recoverable.
  • Each demand claim names a human contribution supported by representative Work rather than a job label, trait, task, MethodDescription, or course.
  • Human, AI, tool, specialist, team, organization, assignment, authority, and environment contributions or gaps remain distinct.
  • Each demand claim has evidence, an inference boundary, uncertainty, and any observation still needed.
  • The result uses one conclusion-specific disposition and does not suppress a lawful prospective hypothesis merely because qualified current demand is blocked.
  • Every blocker names the missing input, blocked conclusion, and retry condition; available material is distinguished from that input when it could mislead the receiver.
  • Downstream reuse preserves holder, configuration, conditions, horizon, evidence window, and receiving decision.
  • The first result selects no curriculum, provider, intervention, assessment programme, treatment, safety action, release action, or employment action.