HCD.5:6 - Bias-Annotation

Lenses: Gov, Arch, Onto/Epist, Prag, Did. Scope: selecting capability-development Methods from a person’s qualified target and starting evidence, or proposing conditional choices for a future audience.

Recurring bias	Likely drift	Repair
technique allegiance	One school or branded intervention becomes the default.	Compare proposed mechanisms and a serious alternative against the exact target and starting attempt.
activity bias	Attendance, repetition, coaching time, or content exposure substitutes for change in the target.	Name the observation of target change and distinguish it from an intervention-effect claim.
deficit bias	A tool, access, authority, workload, provider, or specialist failure becomes a human limitation.	Issue a non-training return while preserving any separately supported target.
score bias	A scalar selects an intervention without the underlying action or error.	Recover the task, work product, help, error pattern, and inference limit.
novice-default bias	Guidance is kept constant despite changing prior knowledge.	State the learner-fit condition and the rule for reducing, changing, or removing support.
dose bias	More hours or repetitions are presumed causal.	Specify the Method contribution and observation; keep practice history as evidence rather than mechanism proof.
feedback optimism	Any response from a teacher or tool is called useful feedback.	State the information that identifies the action to change and the opportunity for correction.
motivation rhetoric	A theory label explains non-enactment without target or context evidence.	Compare cue, feasibility, support, environment, and the observed target before selecting a self-regulation Method.