Obtain a construction and compare whole alternatives
The provider asks SYSE.8 for a service arrangement that preserves the needed learning activity and equipment conditions. Its request names the required room conditions, equipment readiness, timing, access and ongoing obligation. ME.6 compares the methods and actual overlapping performances. The returned alternatives must identify the contributions that make each combination workable.
| Alternative | What must be supplied | Consequence for the offer |
|---|---|---|
| Continue in the original room with an adequate local adjustment | Evidence that the adjustment permits the intended exercise; agreed use of that room. | Preserve the original schedule only if the learning activity remains viable. |
| Move after the equipment check | Room access, the worker’s later availability, time to move and check, and a workable later learning sequence. | Obtain agreement to the changed schedule; retain consequences for participants who cannot stay. |
| Use another prepared worker or an already prepared partner room | Actual capability, access, equipment readiness and compatible assignments, including any coordination and cost. | Offer immediate continuation only after those conditions are supplied. |
Use HCD for a missing human capability or a changed learning arrangement, OCE for assignments and access, and Operations for admission and service continuation. An available worker without the relevant preparation is not an equivalent replacement. A suitably prepared partner room may be a new solution even if earlier configurations did not include it. Reuse prior reasoning to find relevant options and recheck it under the new conditions.