OCE.17:4.2 - Trace how another practitioner could continue it

Follow the connections relevant to this move. Who shows a real case? Which source and counterexample does the practitioner encounter? Who can question the result? What opportunity allows an attempt? What support, permission and evidence access are needed? Which result receives recognition? What remains available when a mentor leaves or the next case differs?

Distinguish exposure, understanding, an authorized opportunity, an attempted use, repeated use and later retention. These can have different evidence and different owners. A case bank can remain accessible while no one has time to use it; an excellent teacher can leave behind no recoverable explanation; a practitioner can understand a move but lack permission to inspect the receiving organization’s work.

Inspect a supported instance alongside the doubtful one when that contrast could change the explanation. Include a peripheral, dissenting or departed participant when excluding that experience could reverse the account. This is a bounded inquiry, not a requirement to map every member or association.

Keep observed cultural selection separate from the group’s decision about an intervention. Practitioners may copy a prestigious example despite the facilitator’s choice, or retain a useful variant without a central decision. Neither copying nor a management decision proves that the practice is better.