fpf.tools
Library / Embodied Rhythmics Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 2299–2308

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:40:10 UTC

RHY.13:11 - SoTA-Echoing

Source contributionAdopted useLimit and alternative
Cha’s Takadimi critique, original Takadimi conventions and Nelson’s phrase/gesture practiceDistinguish a reference supplied by a gesture, duration supplied by another representation, and the learner’s performance of their relation.Withdrawing one source can remove information rather than reveal loss of capability. Choose the intended memory, interpretation or enactment question.
Caramiaux et al. (2018)Their tests separate familiar and novel tempi, altered sequences, timing and movement. Use such distinctions when a claimed transfer depends on them.These were immediate tests in novice keyboard performance. Their results do not establish delayed retention or a universal amount of practice variation.
PianoGymIts simulated learner and fatigue-constrained scheduling benchmark makes a useful claim boundary explicit: performance in a learner model is a model result.The study’s reported mastery and fatigue outcomes come from its simulator. They do not themselves establish a human learner’s retained capability or physiological safety.

A current source changes this Method’s use when it changes the relevant contribution, probe interpretation or qualification. Prefer a directly adequate performance contrast over importing a study’s apparatus without its task. Refresh only the affected comparison and resulting claim.