STR.2:11 - SoTA-Echoing

How should a team respond to changed strategic information? Adapt the sensing-to-choice relation in Teece’s Dynamic Capabilities: Foundational Concepts (2025): attention to environmental change should inform the capability and strategic response actually needed. The serious alternative is periodic reconsideration of the whole plan, which can be efficient when many coupled premises change together. For a bounded change, however, that response can spend scarce capacity without altering most decisions. Sections 4.2–4.5 select direct-use comparison and preservation of unaffected work. The source is a theoretical synthesis, not proof that a particular frequency of sensing improves performance; the accepted trade-off is explicit reliance recovery instead of automatic breadth.

How can a changed source reach an uncited use? Adopt FPF A.10.1’s actual-dependence and bounded-coverage distinction for that branch, rather than treating a citation graph as the impact result. It changes the source example and the no-impact claim in the checklist. A single direct comparison remains cheaper when the one receiving use is already known. Reopen this choice when repeated misses reveal an inadequate discovery boundary or when several strategic consequences can no longer be separated truthfully.

What if the reported number has not changed? The changed-premise question includes the population, use, comparison rule and next action. A strategic filter applies that rule to concrete proposals. Strategy revision includes both versioning and filter changes; the pattern distinguishes what must be preserved from what needs reconsideration. Sections 4.1–4.3 and the filter example apply that distinction. Merely replacing values in the old scoring sheet remains sufficient when its basis still fits; it fails when the new use changes eligibility or the meaning of comparison. Preserve prior observations and return only the affected new comparison, not a compulsory restart.