fpf.tools
Library / Human Capability Development Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 1254–1268

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 16:02:47 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 16:03:51 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 16:40:20 UTC

HCD.2:4.4 - Compare the Finite Programme Changes

Use C.11.CRC to compare each realizable candidate configuration with the person’s current configuration. Name the baseline, finite addition or substitution, candidate configuration, horizon, scenarios, result and resource coordinates, interactions, uncertainty, transition, reversibility, and option effects.

For HCD.2, the decision-bearing coordinates normally include:

  • closure of the required later-Work outputs and protected critical-error conditions;
  • learner, teacher, assessor, specialist, tool, and transition burden;
  • dependence on references, AI, cues, project access, authority, and provider availability;
  • preservation of current strengths and practice needed by other contributions;
  • the qualified expectation and evidence plan for supported, independent, changed-condition, transfer, and delayed performance; and
  • future development options and the cost of reopening a closed route.

Use dominated, non-dominated, beneficial, harmful, or indeterminate only for the candidates, coordinates, horizon, conditions, and evidence actually compared. A programme is not non-dominated merely because it was generated, and one feasible candidate is not dominant merely because no rival is ready. HCD.2 supplies the comparison claim; C.11 supplies any later bounded choice from the complete choice inputs.