Library / Human Capability Development Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 03:55:20 UTC

HCD.4:6 - Bias-Annotation

Recurring biasLikely driftRepair
scalar biasOne score hides claim identity, critical errors, support dependence, and uncertainty.Keep claim rows; aggregate only when the receiving decision loses nothing material.
ladder biasCurrent, intermediate, and target states become a universal maturity path.Use intermediate descriptions only when decision-useful and condition-qualified; distinguish intended targets from observed states.
curriculum biasCourse order becomes capability architecture.Recover simultaneous later-Work contributions and keep curriculum future and separate.
source-layout biasA Method hierarchy, Work order, organization chart, or dashboard becomes the profile.Recover contributions and their mutual constraints from simultaneous Work. Use a corresponding source structure only when that correspondence is justified for the profile question.
tool-score biasA model prediction or assisted result becomes human mastery.Bind the prediction to its task, data, support posture, uncertainty, and direct evidence.
deficit-only biasStrong claims disappear while one gap is amplified.State what must be preserved and the trade-off created by prioritizing the gap.
chooser biasA manager, platform, or assisting System is treated as the chooser without a current choice relation.Name DecisionSubject and granularity; route unresolved agency to A.13.
probe-for-free biasMore information is always requested.Name budget, cost, decision-changing value, and the condition for stopping.
authority collapseA profile recommendation becomes authorization, employment action, safety choice, or commitment.Keep comparison, ChoiceResult, authorization, commitment, and later Work separate.