Library / Human Capability Development Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 10:15:17 UTC

HCD.4:7 - Conformance Checklist

  • One exact human holder and a compatible HCD.1 demand account or equivalent qualified scope are recoverable.
  • Later-Work family, configuration, conditions, horizon, evidence window, receiving decision, and representative simultaneous interfaces are explicit.
  • Each claim row states contribution, current evidence, target, optional intermediate only when useful, conditions, support posture, observation date, uncertainty, discriminating task/evidence, critical-error boundary, trade-off, and next change point.
  • Profile descriptions and their comparison or aggregate are distinguished from instructional plans, realized learning trajectory, performed learning Work, and human transformation; occurrence and change claims have corresponding evidence.
  • Any source structure used for the profile is justified by the contributions and mutual constraints in representative Work.
  • Supported claims to preserve are visible alongside gaps and trade-offs.
  • An aggregate is used only when it removes no decision-bearing identity, asymmetry, critical-error, support, or uncertainty value.
  • The profile first returns priority characteristics, trade-offs, limiting gaps, and a recommendation or unresolved question to one named owner.
  • For any bounded choice, the chooser has applied the ChoiceRule to the required current C.11 inputs; the record includes chooser granularity, pre-existing options, comparison basis, belief, outcome model, rule, applicable inquiry values, emitted result, participation and authority. Keep a reason or limit needed for this or a later use in the substantive result.
  • A missing decision or evidence value required for the affected conclusion produces profile-decision-blocked with blocked choice, safe boundary, and exact retry condition.
  • The result fabricates no HCD.2 programme and authorizes no curriculum, provider, employment, safety, legal, clinical, or release action.
  • The receiver can identify claims to preserve, the consequential gap, what could reverse the recommendation, and who decides next.