LDR.Source:1 - What this text depends on
LDR.1, LDR.2 and LDR.4 identify the three leadership patterns in this publication. B.5.SD supplies the separately published intellectual-answer construction. Cite the framework title, edition and pattern when a particular account matters; a short PatternID assumes that its supplying publication is known.
The four Methods distinguish enabling contribution, feasible agreement, connected subject reasoning, and preparation through first useful performance.
The text uses FPF’s distinction between a method, its description, planned work and performed work; the receiving-result construction in C.39; the several-structure synthesis in C.32.MWA; the cost and inquiry appraisal in C.11.DUA; and the separate evidence boundaries for cultural continuation and causal effects in C.36/C.36.RP and C.28. The source basis is the FPF edition consulted on 11 October 2026; the direct returns below identify the contributions and conditions used here.
The references below return to published methods. They provide descriptions from which a practitioner can obtain a result; citation does not mean that a local result, authorization, capability or agreement has already been produced.
| Relied-on publication and content | Result needed here and receiving use | Use condition and return |
|---|---|---|
| FPF, C.39:4 | A connected way to obtain a missing result; used when B.5.SD lacks an operative subject construction or connection. | Use an adequate direct method when available. Reopen the construction if the receiving result or needed relation changes. |
| FPF C.32.MWA:4 | Distinguishes and relates methods, work, capability and arrangements; used in LDR.1’s allocation of contributions. | Do not infer one method per job or one performer per pattern. A changed performer configuration can require redesign of the whole arrangement. |
| FPF A.3.1.QM — Qualify a Method for Its Intended Contribution | Bounded qualification of a leadership Method or candidate account and its independently decidable local connections after a doubtful use. | Preserve the subject’s status and actual receiving conditions. Retain sufficient current evidence; revise only the failed contribution or select an adequate alternative. OCE.15 supplies construction of an organization-change contribution when that specific question remains. |
| FPF C.11/C.11.DUA:4 and D.4 | A warranted decision or inquiry and value-conflict reasoning; used for alternatives, disputed demands and plural parties. | Retain effective obligations until properly changed. A comparison is not another party’s consent. |
| Organization Change Engineering (OCE), OCE.4–7 and .9–11 | Organizational contribution relations, assignments, coordinated product/organization choices, capability realization, participation inquiry and service/change reconciliation. | Required when the receiving use actually changes or depends on those organizational conditions. A leadership conversation does not supply their results. |
| OCE.18 | Connects a human career transition to actual receiving work, compatible current work, preparation, time and assignment. | Preserve the person’s aims and agreed use of learning observations. Use for that complete organizational question; a leadership-development target alone does not grant an appointment. |
| Human Capability Development (HCD), HCD.1/.3/.4/.7/.8 | Human demand, target, capability profile, provider/access conditions and development of a missing provider capability. | Needed for a human-learning claim. Do not transfer its learning mechanisms to an organization or AI without their own methods. |
| Corporate Governance (CGOV), CGOV.3/.11 | Applicable corporate power and an effective decision with usable conditions. | Use the corporation’s actual rules and adequate existing delegation. Consultation and agreement cannot replace a required act. |
| Community Building (CB), CB.13 | Representation and a workable shared-decision mandate. | Needed where this is missing in a voluntary or member-governed arrangement; no second protocol when an adequate one exists. |
| Systems Engineering (SYSE), SYSE.6/.17/.24 | Engineering architecture choice, affected systems and whole-result alternatives. | Use for engineering subject work. Other domains need their own professional method rather than an engineering label. |
| Operations Management (OPS), OPS.13 | An authorized response to an existing promise or changed commitment. | A proposed new agreement does not automatically cancel a current obligation. |
| FPF C.41.OF — Fit a Checklist to Its Occasion of Use | A checklist fitted to its actual occasion and continuation. | Use when an execution aid helps; the aid does not perform the subject reasoning or repair a missing result. |
| FPF C.36/C.36.RP and C.28 | Cultural-continuation and causal-claim methods. | Required only for the stronger claims; a first contribution supports neither automatically. |
These are one-way content dependencies of this framework. Their availability as descriptions is distinct from the local availability of capable providers, rights, evidence or resources. If the method needed for a current result is unavailable or incompatible with the local conditions, state that missing contribution and revise the proposed use. A title-level dependency is not closure of the practical question.