MDPE.14:8 - Rationale and Source Use
What current FPF already supplies
C.30.ILC recovers a cross-scope or interlevel residual. C.32.MLAO frames residual-reducing candidates with
selected structures, preserved and lost structure, new burdens, an evolution window, and a named pattern for the
next question. C.32.MWA keeps several non-isomorphic architecture views separate. A.19.CPM owns explicit
comparison, C.11 local choice, and C.28 any causal-use claim.
With those results, a practitioner still needs the Music-and-Dance relation branches, bodily and artistic vetoes,
partner and ensemble criteria, judging and platform alternatives, split-use choices, representative trials, and
domain observations supplied by MDPE.14.
Domain sources and the decisions they change
| Source or maintained result | Action-changing use here | Limit and smallest reopen |
|---|---|---|
| World Swing Dance Council, “Social Etiquette for Swing Dancers” | Direct practitioner guidance supports adapting slot width, choreography, and footwork to available floor space and shifting dancers, attending to the partner, and putting partner well-being above display. This makes floorcraft, partner information, safety, and split use load-bearing in the social-Dance branch. | Updated content is attributed to 2019 and concerns swing. It does not establish Urban Kiz prevalence, one universal floorcraft Method, or the constructed trial observations. Reopen when current direct social-Dance guidance or a result from Work using such a Method changes the candidate set or vetoes. |
| Llurda-Almuzara and Garcia-Falgueras, “From theory to practice: modeling performance in breaking”, 2024 | Adds opponent-relative strategy, music not known in advance, audience and judging, fatigue and injury, and several performance criteria to the competition branch. It blocks reduction to one technical score. | This is a proposed performance model aligned with WDSF rules, not proof of adequate judging or cultural effects. Reopen when direct competition evidence changes the criteria or relation set. |
| Sato, “Reliability of judging in Olympic breaking at the 2024 Paris games”, 2025 | Observed reliability differs by criterion: originality was good while technique, vocabulary, execution, and musicality were poor. This rejects the premise that adding explicit categories alone solves agreement. | One Olympic event, one scoring system, and official result data do not establish validity, causal effects on training, or transfer to other Dance forms. Reopen with another criterion-level result or evidence that changes the decision. |
| Lessard and Demain, “Vers un ‘Breaking fédéral et olympique’…”, 2024 | A 2019–2023 field inquiry reports partial non-adherence to Olympic breaking and preservation concerns. This adds practitioner, institutionalization, format, and cultural-continuity relations to the judging decision. | The French field case does not represent every breaking population or establish that one arrangement caused a cultural change. Reopen when a direct population or event result changes the response. |
| Taylor, “Algorithms, affordances and the ambiguity of credit on TikTok”, 2025 | Separates recommendation feed, sound, and caption affordances and shows how informal Dance-credit practices can succeed or fail. This makes attribution and platform relations separate from discovery. | One digital ethnography and challenge case do not establish the origin of every Dance, the causal effect of recommendation, or learning transfer. Reopen when a platform or creator result changes attribution choices. |
| Blanchet et al., “Enhancing the Educational Potential of Online Movement Videos”, 2025 | Two user studies show that segmentation and emoji labels help only inside a well-designed lesson; visual aids can overload attention. This separates discovery carrier, lesson structure, guided part practice, and uncued whole-practice testing. | TikTok challenges and short motor-learning studies do not establish partner-Dance transfer, durable retention, cultural continuation, or one universal lesson design. Reopen with representative transfer or retention evidence. |
| Timing examples in the Dance profile and the local Balboa cases | Distinguishes continuous carriers, discrete articulation, timing centres, and representation choices. It helps recognize conflicts without merging Music and Dance Methods. | It supplies comparison and Method-design input, not one universal timing ontology or shared exercise Method. |
| Shimon project, mechatronic expressivity study, and social-gesture study | Supplies configuration-bound actuation, gesture, timing, attention, noise, and musical-plausibility concerns for robotic Music trials. | Separate configurations and studies are not one comparable evidence set and do not establish cultural continuation or human-held development authority for the robot. |
The social-Dance case is a constructed teaching application informed by direct guidance. The breaking cases use reported model, reliability, and field-inquiry results but stop before unsupported causal conclusions. The short-video case uses current platform and learning results to change the selected relation structure and candidate set; its school decision remains a constructed application until performed Work and observations obtain.
Refresh a source when it changes a relation branch, candidate, veto, observation, or decision. A newer paper, official rule, popular style, or platform metric does not displace representative project evidence by status.