Library / Marketing Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:25:20 UTC

MKT.14:4.2 - Choose the breadth and degree of shared work

Choose two related things: the breadth of the useful result within an organisation and the justified common work across organisations. A long joint change can contain several linked results; a limited programme can resolve one decision. Either may use reusable preparation where its grounds apply.

Way of workingWhen it can be usefulWhat must be constructed
Broad individual programmeSeveral related opportunities require a continuing joint change and coordinated investment.Their common purpose, dependencies, separate results and sequence of supported commitments.
Limited individual programmeOne organisation or department needs a particular result under distinctive conditions.The sufficient inquiry, contribution, participants and continuation for that result.
Shared work for a justified groupNamed organisations have sufficiently similar work, useful contribution and application conditions.A transferable common basis, local adaptation rules, separate promises and exception handling.
Repeatable work with a wider named populationReliable organisation and opportunity information can support prepared choices and receiving work at the intended volume.The information, action variants, selection conditions, performers and maintenance needed for repeated execution.

These are alternatives to compare, not mandatory stages. Wider repeatable work may include several groups and individual exceptions; it need not be fully automated. Broad individual work can finish with a small remaining problem that needs only a limited programme. A shared group can dissolve when its common basis no longer holds.

Test the proposed commonality against the actual result. Similar sector or company size may help locate candidates but is insufficient when one needs batch-file analysis and another needs unavailable continuous integration. Ask which preparation transfers, what must change locally, and whether those changes still make sharing worthwhile. Preserve evidence from each consequential difference; information about one client does not automatically apply to the others.