Control Architecture Design Principles Framework
5 patterns · 138 sections
Choose a heading to read that text in full, or open the complete publication.
Table of contents
- Control Architecture Design Principles Framework
- Table of Contents
- A. Choose the information available to control
- B. Design a planning-and-feedback architecture
- Control Architecture Design Principles Framework Readme
- Enter from the control question
- Control Architecture Design Architectural Reference
- CAD.Reference:1 - What the language helps obtain
- CAD.Reference:2 - The objects and independently useful contributions
- CAD.Reference:3 - Information, tracking and execution must describe the same loop
- CAD.Reference:3.1 - How information changes a command margin
- CAD.Reference:3.2 - A complete joint design and a changed delay
- CAD.Reference:4 - The layered planning-and-feedback branch
- CAD.Reference:4.1 - The recurring whole problem
- CAD.Reference:4.2 - Why these four contributions belong together
- CAD.Reference:4.3 - Connect dynamics, decisions and computation by their actual quantities
- CAD.Reference:4.4 - Reuse the external foundations without losing the subject transition
- CAD.Reference:4.5 - Several legitimate entries and their returns
- CAD.Reference:4.5.1 - Keep a qualified loop and govern its commands
- CAD.Reference:4.6 - Worked joint revision
- CAD.Reference:4.7 - Recognition, assurance and the cost of the arrangement
- CAD.Reference:4.8 - Source boundaries, bias and future change
- CAD.Reference:5 - What is covered and what must be supplied
- CAD.Reference:6 - Why one language, with independent uses
- CAD.Reference:7 - Sources, external suppliers and consequential change
- CAD.Reference:8 - Names and continuing references
- CAD.Reference:End
- A. Choose the information available to control
- CAD.5CAD.5 - Choose Observations and Internal State for Control
- CAD.5:1 - Problem frame
- CAD.5:2 - Problem
- CAD.5:3 - Forces
- CAD.5:4 - Solution
- CAD.5:4.1 - Fix the action time and the control-relevant distinctions
- CAD.5:4.2 - Form realizable observation and timing alternatives
- CAD.5:4.3 - Construct an internal state that can be updated
- CAD.5:4.4 - Preserve the information needed by the next update
- CAD.5:4.5 - Obtain a usable error bound
- CAD.5:4.6 - Establish control under that information
- CAD.5:4.7 - Connect the information result to a layered control construction
- CAD.5:4.8 - Compare whole alternatives and return to the failed dependence
- CAD.5:4.9 - Make the result executable and reusable
- CAD.5:5 - Archetypal Grounding
- CAD.5:5.1 - A rapid partial observation and a delayed complete observation
- CAD.5:5.2 - Why the individual channels do not suffice
- CAD.5:5.3 - Increase the delay, then change the design or the demand
- CAD.5:5.4 - What an internal-path ablation does and does not establish
- CAD.5:5.5 - Recover two coupled coordinates from observations at different times
- CAD.5:6 - Bias-Annotation
- CAD.5:7 - Conformance Checklist
- CAD.5:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- CAD.5:9 - Consequences
- CAD.5:10 - Rationale
- CAD.5:11 - SoTA-Echoing
- CAD.5:12 - Relations
- CAD.5:End
- B. Design a planning-and-feedback architecture
- CAD.1CAD.1 - Derive a Control Decomposition from the Whole Problem
- CAD.1:1 - Problem frame
- CAD.1:2 - Problem
- CAD.1:3 - Forces
- CAD.1:4 - Solution
- CAD.1:4.1 - Formulate the unsplit question
- CAD.1:4.2 - Separate decisions because their information and effects differ
- CAD.1:4.3 - Expose what the split removes
- CAD.1:4.4 - Make the slow decision account for fast consequences
- CAD.1:4.5 - Preserve the whole question through the next design move
- CAD.1:5 - Archetypal Grounding
- CAD.1:6 - Bias-Annotation
- CAD.1:7 - Conformance Checklist
- CAD.1:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- CAD.1:9 - Consequences
- CAD.1:10 - Architectural Rationale
- CAD.1:11 - SoTA-Echoing
- CAD.1:12 - Relations
- CAD.1:End
- CAD.2CAD.2 - Construct the Planning and Feedback Interface
- CAD.2:1 - Problem frame
- CAD.2:2 - Problem
- CAD.2:3 - Forces
- CAD.2:4 - Solution
- CAD.2:4.1 - Define the exchanged behavior
- CAD.2:4.2 - Derive the error instead of assuming tracking
- CAD.2:4.3 - Add the clock, held values and reset events
- CAD.2:4.4 - Return an interface that can be tested and changed
- CAD.2:5 - Archetypal Grounding
- CAD.2:5.1 - A held reference
- CAD.2:5.2 - A continuous reference segment
- CAD.2:6 - Bias-Annotation
- CAD.2:7 - Conformance Checklist
- CAD.2:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- CAD.2:9 - Consequences
- CAD.2:10 - Architectural Rationale
- CAD.2:11 - SoTA-Echoing
- CAD.2:12 - Relations
- CAD.2:End
- CAD.3CAD.3 - Construct a Jointly Admissible Command Domain
- CAD.3:1 - Problem frame
- CAD.3:2 - Problem
- CAD.3:3 - Forces
Showing 1–100 of 138 entries. Source edition d4387cb33248.