Research Method Practice Principles Framework
11 patterns · 355 sections
Choose a heading to read that text in full, or open the complete publication.
Table of contents
- Research Method Practice Principles Framework
- Table of Contents
- Public units
- Research Method Practice Principles Framework Readme
- Practical entries
- RMP-SEAL — Separate routine qualification from a mechanism-validity inquiry
- RMP-CITIZEN — Investigate a stream anomaly without an affiliation gate
- RMP-CORRECTION — Repair an analysis and return its consequence without discarding a suitable method
- Research Method Practice Principles Framework Architectural Reference
- RMP.Reference:1 - The practical question behind research and engineering
- RMP.Reference:2 - Forces that shape the first result
- RMP.Reference:3 - Research membership is not institutional status
- RMP.Reference:4 - Question, frame, design, Work, result, and decision remain distinct
- RMP.Reference:5 - Criticism comes before method prestige
- RMP.Reference:6 - Pattern relations do not prescribe a research lifecycle
- RMP.Reference:7 - Use the two contributions together
- RMP.Reference:8 - Connect operationalization and actual trace
- RMP.Reference:9 - Connect analysis and the credibility choice
- RMP.Reference:10 - Connect corpus synthesis and exact revision
- RMP.Reference:11 - Connect Method improvement and research consequences
- RMP.Reference:12 - Conditions for a usable combined result
- RMP.Reference:13 - Architectural Rationale
- RMP.Reference:14 - What the repertoire foregrounds and leaves outside
- RMP.Reference:15 - Intended use and ordinary non-use
- RMP.Reference:16 - Judge the connected result
- RMP.Reference:17 - Bias and the reach of these examples
- RMP.Reference:18 - Failures at the connection between the patterns
- RMP.Reference:19 - Practical consequences and revision
- RMP.Reference:20 - PatternID and reader order
- RMP.Reference:21 - Available repertoire and scope
- RMP.Reference:22 - Direct result relations and non-lifecycle topology
- RMP.Reference:23 - What the sources contribute to the shared architecture
- RMP.Reference:24 - Using FPF for the source answer
- RMP.Reference:25 - External result and authority boundaries
- RMP.Reference:26 - Public returns to adjoining practice
- RMP.Reference:27 - Representative case coverage
- RMP.Reference:28 - Publication and maintenance boundary
- RMP.Reference:End
- Part I - Qualify the Question and Choose a Design or Stop
- RMP.1RMP.1 — Decide Whether a Question Needs Research and When to Stop
- RMP.1:0 - Use This When
- RMP.1:0.1 - Working Terms
- RMP.1:1 - Problem Frame
- RMP.1:2 - Problem
- RMP.1:3 - Forces
- RMP.1:4 - Solution
- RMP.1:4.1 - Pattern-Use Unfolding
- RMP.1:4.2 - Four-Condition Research-Membership Test
- RMP.1:4.3 - Answer from Existing Sources before Starting a Study
- RMP.1:4.3.1 - Find and interpret the relevant material
- RMP.1:4.3.2 - Compare alternatives when their difference matters
- RMP.1:4.4 - Nearest Non-Members and Exact Returns
- RMP.1:4.5 - Record the Result
- RMP.1:4.6 - Frascati Criteria Mutated for This Boundary
- RMP.1:4.7 - First-Hour Qualification Card
- RMP.1:4.8 - What Changes in Practice
- RMP.1:5 - Archetypal Grounding
- RMP.1:5.1 - Corporate Seal-Test Case
- RMP.1:5.2 - Citizen Stream-Salinity Transfer
- RMP.1:5.3 - Historical Source-Critical Contrast
- RMP.1:5.4 - Retrieval-Sufficient Stop
- RMP.1:5.5 - Recover an Answer from the Texts
- RMP.1:5.6 - Compare the Answers that Existing Reports Can Supply
- RMP.1:5.7 - One Supplied Protocol, Two Different Epistemic Tasks
- RMP.1:6 - Bias-Annotation
- RMP.1:7 - Conformance Checklist
- RMP.1:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- RMP.1:9 - Consequences
- RMP.1:10 - Rationale
- RMP.1:11 - SoTA-Echoing
- RMP.1:12 - Relations
- RMP.1:End
- RMP.2RMP.2 — Choose a Criticism-Bearing Research Design or Stop
- RMP.2:0 - Use This When
- RMP.2:0.1 - Working Terms
- RMP.2:1 - Problem Frame
- RMP.2:2 - Problem
- RMP.2:3 - Forces
- RMP.2:4 - Solution
- RMP.2:4.1 - Admit the Design Question
- RMP.2:4.2 - Test the Evidence-Sufficient Stop
- RMP.2:4.3 - Expose Selection-Changing Inputs
- RMP.2:4.4 - Compose Serious Design-or-Stop Options
- RMP.2:4.5 - Preserve Design-Family Differences
- RMP.2:4.6 - Compare on One Decision-Bearing Canvas
- RMP.2:4.7 - Return Exactly One ResearchDesignDisposition
- RMP.2:4.8 - What Changes in Practice
- RMP.2:5 - Archetypal Grounding
- RMP.2:5.1 - Accelerated Seal-Test: Different Supplied Values
- RMP.2:5.1.1 - Derive and repair the mechanism comparison
- RMP.2:5.1.2 - Select the disposition under the supplied facts
- RMP.2:5.2 - Citizen Stream Salinity: Dispositions without an Affiliation Gate
- RMP.2:5.3 - Historical Source-Critical Case
- RMP.2:5.4 - PostSelectionNeed Counterfactual
- RMP.2:6 - Bias-Annotation
- RMP.2:7 - Conformance Checklist
- RMP.2:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- RMP.2:9 - Consequences
- RMP.2:10 - Rationale
- RMP.2:11 - SoTA-Echoing
Showing 1–100 of 355 entries. Source edition 8c72429c9a07.