fpf.tools
DPF

Leadership Principles Framework

3 patterns · 104 sections

Choose a heading to read that text in full, or open the complete publication.

Read full textSearch this publicationOriginal Markdown

Table of contents

Overview · All sections
  1. Leadership Principles Framework
  2. Table of Contents
  3. Leadership Readme
  4. Practical entries
  5. MISSING-HELP — The work waits for one person to intervene
  6. WHOLE-AGREEMENT — Each offer is plausible, but they do not fit together
  7. UNANSWERED-QUESTION — A productive discussion still leaves no usable answer
  8. JOINT-START — Get from a promising idea to a useful contribution
  9. Leadership Principles Framework Architectural Reference
  10. LDR.Reference:1 - The working situation and useful result
  11. LDR.Reference:2 - How the three leadership methods and their suppliers connect
  12. LDR.Reference:3 - What remains with other practices
  13. LDR.Reference:4 - Authority, cost and sufficient ordinary work
  14. LDR.Reference:5 - People, organizations and capable AI
  15. LDR.Reference:6 - How to use and question the result
  16. LDR.Reference:End
  17. Leadership patterns
  18. LDR.1LDR.1 - Obtain and Continue the Leadership Contribution Needed for Joint Work
  19. LDR.1:1 - Problem frame
  20. LDR.1:2 - Problem
  21. LDR.1:3 - Forces
  22. LDR.1:4 - Solution
  23. LDR.1:4.1 - Find the contribution through the receiving work
  24. LDR.1:4.2 - Select a capable arrangement and retain an adequate one
  25. LDR.1:4.3 - Make help usable under actual work conditions
  26. LDR.1:4.4 - Perform the smallest sufficient working conversation
  27. LDR.1:4.5 - Obtain human development when that additional result is worthwhile
  28. LDR.1:4.6 - Continue with the stated help, and change the arrangement when needed
  29. LDR.1:4.7 - Reconstruct the arrangement when an AI can perform the contribution
  30. LDR.1:5 - Archetypal Grounding
  31. LDR.1:5.1 - A mentor who does not control assignments
  32. LDR.1:5.2 - An ordinary brief around a disputed source
  33. LDR.1:6 - Bias-Annotation
  34. LDR.1:7 - Conformance Checklist
  35. LDR.1:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
  36. LDR.1:9 - Consequences
  37. LDR.1:10 - Rationale
  38. LDR.1:11 - SoTA-Echoing
  39. LDR.1:12 - Relations
  40. LDR.1:End
  41. LDR.2LDR.2 - Agree Feasible Joint Contributions
  42. LDR.2:1 - Problem frame
  43. LDR.2:2 - Problem
  44. LDR.2:3 - Forces
  45. LDR.2:4 - Solution
  46. LDR.2:4.1 - Establish who can explore and who can commit
  47. LDR.2:4.2 - Recover the condition behind a position
  48. LDR.2:4.3 - Construct whole alternatives before requesting commitment
  49. LDR.2:4.4 - Resolve a choice-changing unknown, then rebuild the proposal
  50. LDR.2:4.5 - Test joint performance, not just individual promises
  51. LDR.2:4.6 - Obtain responses to the same complete version
  52. LDR.2:4.7 - Return the agreement to work and respond to a changed contribution
  53. LDR.2:4.8 - Negotiate with or through capable AI
  54. LDR.2:5 - Archetypal Grounding
  55. LDR.2:5.1 - A limited first interface
  56. LDR.2:5.2 - The support disappears
  57. LDR.2:5.3 - Joint work without a common employer
  58. LDR.2:6 - Bias-Annotation
  59. LDR.2:7 - Conformance Checklist
  60. LDR.2:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
  61. LDR.2:9 - Consequences
  62. LDR.2:10 - Rationale
  63. LDR.2:11 - SoTA-Echoing
  64. LDR.2:12 - Relations
  65. LDR.2:End
  66. LDR.4LDR.4 - Prepare a Proposal for Decision and First Use
  67. LDR.4:1 - Problem frame
  68. LDR.4:2 - Problem
  69. LDR.4:3 - Forces
  70. LDR.4:4 - Solution
  71. LDR.4:4.1 - Make the receiving work and proposed change examinable
  72. LDR.4:4.2 - Obtain relevant trusted judgement
  73. LDR.4:4.3 - Trace consequences in representative work
  74. LDR.4:4.4 - Answer objections by improving the proposal or preserving a real limit
  75. LDR.4:4.5 - Obtain an effective decision and actual commitments
  76. LDR.4:4.6 - Make the same start mutually visible
  77. LDR.4:4.7 - Complete the first useful handover
  78. LDR.4:4.8 - Continue at the justified scope and reopen the right question
  79. LDR.4:4.9 - Reconsider the whole introduction when capable AI changes the cost
  80. LDR.4:5 - Archetypal Grounding
  81. LDR.4:5.1 - Trusted advice changes a calculation handover
  82. LDR.4:5.2 - First use exposes work that agreement did not perform
  83. LDR.4:5.3 - Changed conditions select different repairs
  84. LDR.4:5.4 - A routine proposal needs no preparation campaign
  85. LDR.4:6 - Bias-Annotation
  86. LDR.4:7 - Conformance Checklist
  87. LDR.4:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
  88. LDR.4:9 - Consequences
  89. LDR.4:10 - Rationale
  90. LDR.4:11 - SoTA-Echoing
  91. LDR.4:12 - Relations
  92. LDR.4:End
  93. Connected use: a federation begins a joint evidence service
  94. LDR.Use:1 - A worthwhile proposal with incompatible contributions
  95. LDR.Use:2 - Advice changes the promise
  96. LDR.Use:3 - Agree a feasible first month
  97. LDR.Use:4 - Begin and complete a useful contribution
  98. LDR.Use:5 - Qualified autonomous AI changes the feasible whole
  99. LDR.Use:6 - Continuation after success is another substantive question
  100. Source, dependency and edition notes

Showing 1–100 of 104 entries. Source edition 8c72429c9a07.